<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do People Care About Race?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popsych.org/why-do-people-care-about-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popsych.org/why-do-people-care-about-race/</link>
	<description>The Internet&#039;s Best Evolutionary Psycholo-guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://popsych.org/why-do-people-care-about-race/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsych.org/?p=3758#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>Related?

http://pss.sagepub.com/content/21/11/1623

Genetic Evidence for Multiple Biological Mechanisms Underlying In-Group Favoritism

Abstract:
In-group favoritism is ubiquitous and associated with intergroup conflict, yet is little understood from a biological perspective. A fundamental question regarding the structure of favoritism is whether it is inflexibly directed toward distinct, “essentialist” categories, such as ethnicity and race, or is deployed in a context-sensitive manner. In this article, we report the first study (to our knowledge) of the genetic and environmental structure of in-group favoritism in the religious, ethnic, and racial domains. We contrasted a model of favoritism based on a single domain-general central affiliation mechanism (CAM) with a model in which each domain was influenced by specific mechanisms.&lt;strong&gt; In a series of multivariate analyses, utilizing a large, representative sample of twins, models containing only the CAM or essentialist domains fit the data poorly. The best-fitting model revealed that a biological mechanism facilitates affiliation with arbitrary groups and exists alongside essentialist systems that evolved to process salient cues, such as shared beliefs and ancestry.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related?</p>
<p><a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/21/11/1623" rel="nofollow">http://pss.sagepub.com/content/21/11/1623</a></p>
<p>Genetic Evidence for Multiple Biological Mechanisms Underlying In-Group Favoritism</p>
<p>Abstract:<br />
In-group favoritism is ubiquitous and associated with intergroup conflict, yet is little understood from a biological perspective. A fundamental question regarding the structure of favoritism is whether it is inflexibly directed toward distinct, “essentialist” categories, such as ethnicity and race, or is deployed in a context-sensitive manner. In this article, we report the first study (to our knowledge) of the genetic and environmental structure of in-group favoritism in the religious, ethnic, and racial domains. We contrasted a model of favoritism based on a single domain-general central affiliation mechanism (CAM) with a model in which each domain was influenced by specific mechanisms.<strong> In a series of multivariate analyses, utilizing a large, representative sample of twins, models containing only the CAM or essentialist domains fit the data poorly. The best-fitting model revealed that a biological mechanism facilitates affiliation with arbitrary groups and exists alongside essentialist systems that evolved to process salient cues, such as shared beliefs and ancestry.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
