<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Fuss Over Sperm Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popsych.org/some-fuss-over-sperm-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popsych.org/some-fuss-over-sperm-competition/</link>
	<description>The Internet&#039;s Best Evolutionary Psycholo-guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Marczyk</title>
		<link>http://popsych.org/some-fuss-over-sperm-competition/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Marczyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 23:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsych.org/?p=3030#comment-958</guid>
		<description>I wish I had something more insightful to say on the subject, but lack of advertising fertility in women is not my strong suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I had something more insightful to say on the subject, but lack of advertising fertility in women is not my strong suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curly</title>
		<link>http://popsych.org/some-fuss-over-sperm-competition/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Curly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsych.org/?p=3030#comment-957</guid>
		<description>The loss of female fertility advertisements is a strange thing. Most people think about it in terms of females evolving to &quot;hide&quot; their fertile window for some reason, maybe to trick males into to staying with them or something. Isn&#039;t it more likely that advertising was lost because it simply became unnecessary? Maybe we evolved to mate throughout the menstrual cycle first and this then made advertising fertility unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The loss of female fertility advertisements is a strange thing. Most people think about it in terms of females evolving to &#8220;hide&#8221; their fertile window for some reason, maybe to trick males into to staying with them or something. Isn&#8217;t it more likely that advertising was lost because it simply became unnecessary? Maybe we evolved to mate throughout the menstrual cycle first and this then made advertising fertility unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Marczyk</title>
		<link>http://popsych.org/some-fuss-over-sperm-competition/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Marczyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 00:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsych.org/?p=3030#comment-956</guid>
		<description>That was along the lines of what I was thinking, but it might also have to do with the concealed ovulation factor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was along the lines of what I was thinking, but it might also have to do with the concealed ovulation factor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curly</title>
		<link>http://popsych.org/some-fuss-over-sperm-competition/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Curly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsych.org/?p=3030#comment-955</guid>
		<description>I always thought that the high frequency that men want to copulate with their mates was evidence that infidelity was a problem in prehistoric societies. By regularly copulating with his mate a man would ensure that her reproductive tract was constantly filled with his sperm and minimise the chances of her being fertilised by other men she had sex with when he wasn&#039;t around. 

Doesn&#039;t that count as a kind of sperm competition or are you only talking about specific adaptations that sperm cells may have to compete with other sperms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that the high frequency that men want to copulate with their mates was evidence that infidelity was a problem in prehistoric societies. By regularly copulating with his mate a man would ensure that her reproductive tract was constantly filled with his sperm and minimise the chances of her being fertilised by other men she had sex with when he wasn&#8217;t around. </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t that count as a kind of sperm competition or are you only talking about specific adaptations that sperm cells may have to compete with other sperms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
